Ever read a letter to the editor in the paper that leaves you wondering WTF? We’ve got one of these in the local paper today. And I quote in part:
…Why do so many “tolerant” liberals hate Sarah Palin, especially those of the female persuasion? Here’s a little test you can do to make this phenomenon quite easy to understand. Take a photograph, any photograph, of Sarah Palin and put it in front of you. Then take a photograph of a liberal woman, any liberal woman, and put it beside the first picture.
OK? Got it? I rest my case?
John Wilson/Veneta
I’m still trying to decide if this letter is really a joke in disguise. It’s not like liberals or conservatives have a big “L” or “C” tattooed on our foreheads to tell us apart.
So where to start? I haven’t met anyone who actually hates Sarah Palin. I do know there are many people, including me, who question her qualifications to hold any elective office. I suspect that cameras were banned to keep any more pictures of Sarah’s “handy” crib notes. And questions were probably prescreened to avoid any more founding fathers fiascos.

Honest, it really is a coincidence that Sarah is in red and Hillary is in blue. I was looking for shots that were about the same size, lighting and make up.
6 comments:
Oh...I SEE. the whole Sarah Palin phenomenon is about MEN thinking the best qualification for a woman (in ANY job, apparently) is how easy she is on the eyes.
ICK!
Did I say "ICK?"
Yes, you said ICK! Too which I heartily agree. Along with a few other modifiers unsuitable for a semi family blog. LOL
I don't hate Sarah, I just dislike her intensly. And it may have a lot to do with her credentials resting on her looks. I just hate that this is how the world operaties. The pretty girl gets the job regardless of experience and talent. The younger girl is given the job on NBC and older Jane Pauley is tossed aside like yesterdays garbage...oh, I'm just rambling.
You may be rambling, but you're also right.
It also bugs me that the former governor of Alaska seems to have the curiosity of a rock. She seems to be happy with what she knows, or thinks she knows and shows no desire to expand on that.
That and the "death panel" thing. If she was mistaken, it's her responsibility to get the correct information. If she knows she's wrong on this subject (and any other) and keeps putting out wrong information; then she's a liar. And we have enough of those running things already.
"If she knows she's wrong...and keeps putting out wrong information"--she's perfect for Fox News. Evidently a perfect resume point for them, because they hired her...
I can't add anything here, so just let me ditto everything -- Everything -- y'all said.
Post a Comment